Two Quibbles From Today’s Data

All day today, I’ve heard people say that there was no good news in the employment report. That is substantially true, but not totally true. For some time now, labor force drop-outs (shrinkage) have artificially lowered the official unemployment rate. Most pundits recognized that eventually that would reverse and returnees to the labor force would have the opposite effect. That happened in the May report.

In the household survey, which contains such statistics, the number of employed people increased by 422,000, far above the highly-advertised 69,000 in the establishment survey and quite a good number. The civilian labor force, however, actually increased by 642, 000, causing the increase in the unemployment rate from 8.1 percent to 8.2 percent. We’ve been qualifying recent drops in the unemployment rate as being aided by a declining labor force. To be fair we should acknowledge that the reversal of that is actually good news and masked a substantial increase in employment as measured by the household survey.

I can’t account for the large difference in the employment gains in the two surveys, but they both should be considered together to get a complete picture. I’m not saying that the stronger household numbers trump the weaker establishment numbers, but they should not be ignored as they were today.

My second quibble has to do with repeated pronouncements today that additional quantitative easing is not called for because interest rates are so low already. I’m not necessarily calling for additional measures that would be called QE3, but I feel compelled to point out that quantitative easing was given than name because it came after interest rates had ceased to be a viable tool of monetary policy. Monetary policy involves interest rates, but it also involves increases in the quantity of money and credit. QE3 may or may not be appropriate at this point, but that question already assumes that interest rates are out of play.



Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. John B says:

    Do you think the Labor department uses the same formula to extrapolate the data from the two different survey’s? Does’nt the “estatbilishment” survey include a much larger sampling than the “household” survey?”

  2. Lee R. says:

    Hi Bob,

    I’m interested in speaking to you about your content. Please contact me at lee AT forexpros DOT com.

    Thank you,

    About Us
    Founded in 2007, Forexpros is a definitive source for tools and information relating to the financial markets such as real-time quotes and streaming charts, up-to-date financial news, technical analysis, brokers directory & listings, an economic calendar, and tools & calculators. The site provides in-depth information on Currencies, Indices & Stocks, Futures and Options, Commodities, and Rates & Bonds. With a growing readership worldwide, Forexpros is a leading global financial portal that is constantly committed to launching innovative features and sections to ensure an optimal one-stop source for its readers.